# Logical Reasoning in Mathematics MCQs with Answers

Logical Reasoning in Mathematics MCQs are very important test and often asked by various testing services and competitive exams around the world. Here you will find all the Important Logical Reasoning in Mathematics MCQs for Preparation.

The student can clear their concepts for Logical Reasoning in Mathematics online quiz by attempting it. Doing MCQs based Logical Reasoning in Mathematics will help you to check your understanding and identify areas of improvement.

## Logical Reasoning in Mathematics Online MCQs with Answers

In mathematics, logical reasoning is important because it helps:
a) Simplify complex equations.
b) Memorize formulas.
c) Explore abstract concepts.
d) Ignore mathematical proofs.

c) Explore abstract concepts.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to consider:
a) The popularity of the mathematical concept.
b) The emotional appeal of the argument.
c) The logical validity of the argument.
d) The aesthetics of the mathematical notation.

c) The logical validity of the argument.

Logical reasoning in mathematics involves:
a) Following established mathematical rules.
b) Ignoring mathematical axioms.
c) Relying solely on intuition.
d) Evaluating the validity of mathematical statements.

d) Evaluating the validity of mathematical statements.

Which of the following is an example of deductive reasoning in mathematics?
a) Estimating the value of an unknown variable.
b) Applying the distributive property.
c) Proving a mathematical theorem.
d) Following personal beliefs without question.

c) Proving a mathematical theorem.

Inductive reasoning in mathematics involves:
a) Following established mathematical conventions.
b) Making generalizations based on specific examples.
c) Analyzing large data sets.
d) Relying on emotional responses to guide mathematical decisions.

b) Making generalizations based on specific examples.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to avoid:
a) Seeking alternative mathematical notations.
b) Ignoring potential counterexamples.
c) Considering practical applications.
d) Making assumptions without proper evidence.

d) Making assumptions without proper evidence.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics?
a) Ignoring the logical correctness of the mathematical proof.
b) Following mathematical conventions.
c) Relying on empirical evidence.
d) Dismissing potential counterexamples.

a) Ignoring the logical correctness of the mathematical proof.

In mathematics, a valid argument:
a) Is always supported by emotions.
b) Follows logically from the premises.
c) Appeals to personal preferences.
d) Focuses on practical applications.

b) Follows logically from the premises.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it worked well on a few test cases”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) Hasty generalization.
d) Slippery slope.

c) Hasty generalization.

A mathematical approach that relies solely on personal intuition and emotions rather than logical reasoning is considered:
a) Rational and objective.
b) Impulsive and subjective.
c) Informed and evidence-based.
d) Efficient and effective.

b) Impulsive and subjective.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to consider the:
a) Length of the proof.
b) Emotional appeal of the mathematical notation.
c) Coherence and consistency of the mathematical reasoning.
d) Number of mathematicians who endorse the argument.

c) Coherence and consistency of the mathematical reasoning.

A mathematical approach that relies on logical reasoning and evidence to support conclusions is considered:
a) Effective and reliable.
b) Biased and unreliable.
c) Intuitive and spontaneous.
d) Emotional and impulsive.

a) Effective and reliable.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to distinguish between correlation and:
a) Deduction.
b) Causation.
c) Induction.
d) Validity.

b) Causation.

A mathematical approach that presents only two options and ignores other possibilities is committing a fallacy known as:
a) False cause.
b) False dilemma.
c) Hasty generalization.
d) Slippery slope.

b) False dilemma.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it looks elegant”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Straw man.

b) Circular reasoning.

A mathematical approach that relies on personal attacks rather than addressing the merits of the argument is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Slippery slope.
d) Red herring.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is widely accepted by mathematicians”?
a) Appeal to popularity.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Straw man.

a) Appeal to popularity.

A mathematical approach that assumes a cause-and-effect relationship without sufficient evidence is committing a fallacy known as:
a) False cause.
b) False dilemma.
c) Hasty generalization.
d) Slippery slope.

a) False cause.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is proven by a renowned mathematician”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

a) Appeal to authority.

A mathematical approach that presents extreme or exaggerated consequences as a result of certain mathematical choices is committing a fallacy known as:
a) False cause.
b) False dilemma.
c) Hasty generalization.
d) Slippery slope.

d) Slippery slope.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to consider the:
a) Complexity of the mathematical concepts.
b) Emotional appeal of the mathematical notation.
c) Strength of the conclusion.
d) Validity of the premises.

d) Validity of the premises.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it worked well on a few examples”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

d) Hasty generalization.

A mathematical approach that presents a chain of logical deductions without sufficient evidence to support the conclusion is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Straw man.
d) False cause.

d) False cause.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is commonly used by mathematicians”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

a) Appeal to authority.

A mathematical approach that presents an irrelevant or distracting argument to divert attention from the main issue is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Slippery slope.
d) Red herring.

d) Red herring.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to consider the:
a) Emotions of the mathematician.
b) Language used in the mathematical proof.
c) Background of the mathematician.
d) Objectivity and fairness of the reasoning.

d) Objectivity and fairness of the reasoning.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is widely accepted by mathematicians”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

a) Appeal to authority.

A mathematical approach that presents an analogy between two mathematical concepts that are not sufficiently similar is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Straw man.
d) Red herring.

b) False analogy.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is widely accepted by mathematicians”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

c) False analogy.

A mathematical approach that relies on personal attacks rather than addressing the merits of the argument is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Slippery slope.
d) Red herring.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to consider the potential conflicts of interest and:
a) Emotions of the mathematician.
b) Language used in the mathematical proof.
c) Background of the mathematician.
d) Integrity and credibility of the source.

d) Integrity and credibility of the source.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is endorsed by a well-known mathematician”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

a) Appeal to authority.

A mathematical approach that presents a chain of logical deductions without sufficient evidence to support the conclusion is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Straw man.
d) False cause.

d) False cause.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is commonly used by mathematicians”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

b) Circular reasoning.

A mathematical approach that presents an irrelevant or distracting argument to divert attention from the main issue is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Slippery slope.
d) Red herring.

d) Red herring.

When evaluating a logical argument in mathematics, it is important to consider the:
a) Emotions of the mathematician.
b) Language used in the mathematical proof.
c) Background of the mathematician.
d) Integrity and credibility of the source.

d) Integrity and credibility of the source.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it follows the established mathematical conventions”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.

a) Appeal to authority.

A mathematical approach that presents a distorted or oversimplified version of an opponent’s proof in order to make it easier to refute is committing a fallacy known as:
b) False analogy.
c) Straw man.
d) Red herring.

c) Straw man.

Which of the following is a potential flaw in a logical argument in mathematics: “This theorem must be true because it is recommended by a renowned mathematician”?
a) Appeal to authority.
b) Circular reasoning.
c) False analogy.
d) Hasty generalization.